I recently saw a post on Facebook, where a friend shared to her friends, an article she had read. It was a post from a company named Dr. Karr.
The first thing that stands out about this post is that the author’s name was written with a capital K. The author’s name. This is one of the most common forms of self-reference I see on Facebook and it’s especially common with a female and it’s not a bad thing. The author’s post, however, seems to be saying, in this case, that she is very proud of what she did after reading the article.
The article is called, “Women’s self-esteem and the impact of media.” One of the first things I do when I come across articles like that, and when I think about what the authors are trying to say is that women have been told how they are supposed to feel. We’re supposed to say, “I feel good about myself.” We’re supposed to feel proud of our achievements.
I think this is a very valid point, and one that I think most of us (or at least most of us who are women) are too afraid to point out. I don’t think the article is saying women should be proud of themselves; it’s saying that women have to stop putting their ego in their own hands and start taking responsibility for their own actions. It’s not saying, I am always a badass. I’m just a badass in a different way.
The article is a bit ambiguous on the question of responsibility, and the author is a bit vague on how the writer thinks these women should take personal responsibility. It’s a bit like the idea of women being ‘gutless’ or ‘less emotional’– it’s an idea that a lot of people think is a good one, but without knowing how the word is used it’s very hard to know whether the author is intending to be insulting.
Well, I don’t think it is a good idea to be overly emotional. Its a good idea to be tough, but I don’t think that’s the same thing as being emotional.
We see in the trailer that the author takes responsibility for what he or she thinks is wrong. That said, we don’t see the author taking responsibility for their personal emotions. It’s a very different take on the issue.
Your point here is that people who know what they are doing might feel a little like they are being treated by someone. It might be that they are becoming more self-absorbed, or that they may have become more emotional about what they’re doing rather than what they’re not doing.
The author says himself that he “does not feel anger, but only regret”. It is worth noting that it is only the author who is making his or her feelings known. The viewer is not. So we are left to wonder if the writer is feeling any sort of regret for what happened to Colt.
Our story starts off with a young woman named Lily who is very emotional about her feelings for Colt. It’s never mentioned what happened to Colt, but as the story progresses, it becomes increasingly apparent that Colt is missing in action. That’s because while Lily is in the midst of a romantic relationship with Colt, she’s also grieving the loss of her beloved. Colt isn’t exactly helping her and it seems he’s just not feeling it.